Analyzing an Argument
TUT 100- Virtue in Animal and Machine - Professor Weinman
- Summary:
- You will complete the stages of writing a paper by engaging
an author's argument in a novel context.
- Purposes:
- Our goals are to
- engage in creative thought,
- work through the major stages of writing, and
- practice revising and giving/receiving feedback.
- Due:
- There are several milestones for this assignment with various
due dates.
- Writing Lab Appointment:
- 5 pm, Wednesday 9 October
- Sentence Outline:
- 10 pm, Monday 14 October
- Smooth Draft:
- 10 pm, Monday 28 October (first Monday after Fall
Break)
- Final Draft:
- 10 pm, Thursday 7 November
- Turn In:
- Each milestone has a slightly different submission
mechanism.
- Writing Lab Appointment:
- E-mail me your appointment date with
a sentence about what your objective for the session will be.
- Outline and Smooth Draft:
- Submit a copy by the deadline to
PioneerWeb. Bring two copies to class with you the next day.
- Final Draft:
- Submit a copy by the deadline to PioneerWeb. Bring
your sentence outline and smooth draft review sheets and all marked
copies to class on Tuesday 12 November. Please attach them all together
with a paper clip, binder clip, or staple.
Assignment
Bekoff and Pierce have established a context for an exploration of
virtue in animals, clustering their analysis around three categories
of behavior (cooperation, empathy, and justice). Wallach and Allen
have simply set up the motivation for and possibility of machine morality.
Writers and researchers commonly investigate how an existing argument
applies to a novel situation. This approach often leads to discoveries
about the new context or points to shortcomings of the original argument
that must be accounted for or generalized. In this paper, we will
take only the first step by investigating how Bekoff and Pierce's
ideas fit into Wallach and Allen's domain. (You have the option of
taking a subsequent step in your next paper.)
Topic
Wild Justice describes several examples of how various flavors
of cooperation are demonstrated in animals as a means for establishing
their moral behavior. One particularly important arch is given in
Chapter 3, "Cooperation." Your paper should address the question
To what extent can the same argument from cooperation be (potentially)
applied to machines?
Find and use examples of (ro)bot successes, failures, or the lack
of either to demonstrate either
- how their argument extends (or could extend) to "silicon animals",
or
- why and how their argument fails in this case.
Your writing must engage the cooperation-based argument of Bekoff
and Pierce for establishing moral behavior, rather than making your
own. This task should be eased greatly by our prior analysis of their argument.
Audience
The audience for your work should be your peers. That is, someone
who has been exposed to the theories and arguments we have discussed
in class and who has a similar level of scientific understanding.
You must still connect the topics of our readings to your analysis
by showing how they apply.
Length and Format
The length of your paper should be 600-800 words (not including references
or headers and footers). Scholarly
references should be included in a list of works cited at the end
in APA format. Please use a twelve point font and one inch margins.
Your name, the course, and paper title should be on the first page,
while your last name and a page number should be on all other pages.
Revisions
In addition to the peer review we will do, you are required
to make an appointment with the Writing Lab for any stage of this
assignment. The goal of the Writing Lab staff is teaching about any
stage of writing. Therefore, your appointment may be while you are
planning your approach and drafting of your sentence outline, revising
your sentence outline, or during manuscript revisions before or after
your smooth draft. Our purpose is to help you become familiar with
this extremely valuable campus resource and learn even more about
the process of revising.
Make your appointment right away! Go to PioneerWeb, click
on the "Course Areas & Acad Info" tab. Click on the link "Writing
Lab Appointments" in the left-hand column titled "Resources."
You must make an appointment (for any time) by Wednesday 9 October.
Any Writing Lab staff member will be able to help you with this assignment.
Milestones
Sentence Outline
Write an outline of your paper that shows the logical organization
and flow of your argument. All headings (and sub-headings) must be
a complete sentence. These exact sentences may or may not end up in
your paper, but each entry in your outline needs to show a completely
formulated statement. Furthermore, no division (or sub-division) may
consist of only one part. That is, an "A" must have a "B"
and a "1" must have at least an accompanying "2." This format
will help you bring clarity to your paragraph sequence and internal
cohesion. Once you have organized the paper, you should find the task
of writing and developing paragraphs easier. Your outline should adhere
to the same formatting guidelines as your other written assignments:
double-spaced twelve point font with one inch margins and names/titles
in appropriate places.
Please note that your outline is likely to be malleable and subject
to many alterations as you craft your overall argument. Crafting it
is a learning process! Working to construct and re-arrange the skeleton
in this way is much easier than with an entire paper, which
can often be unwieldy.
Here are some suggestions for crafting an outline that will help you
to write your paper effectively:
- Clearly identify your thesis statement at the beginning of your outline.
- Make the top-level of the outline the major points/topic sentences.
- The major points should have a logical ordering.
- Each major point should be supported by evidence.
- Each piece of evidence should be explained, interpreted, or contextualized.
- More complex points should have a synthesis that describes how
the sub-points (e.g., evidence and interpretation) logically entail
your major point.
- The importance of your argument should be reflected in your thesis,
introduction, and/or conclusion.
Because the purpose is to architect your argument's skeleton, paragraph
transition language is not explicitly necessary at this point.
Smooth Draft
As in your first essay assignment, you will bring a smooth draft to
class that will be reviewed and workshopped with your peers. Remember
that this is not to be fresh from your fingers. In addition to the
tips given in the first
assignment you should also run your draft through Professor Simpson's
30 point inspection. That process will likely take you an hour or
more, but it is very much worth it. So that the results are
fresh to you, I recommend giving yourself at least a half day between
when you complete the rough draft and begin your polishing.
Final Draft
Your final draft should exhibit incorporation of the comments from
your peers and the Writing Lab.
Original material is Copyright
© 2010, 2013 Jerod
Weinman, licensed under a Creative
Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
All other material is property of the respective owner(s).